Global Avionics Round-Up from Aircraft Value News (AVN)
Oliver Floricke / Unsplash
In global aviation, disruption in the flow of parts and materials isn’t just a procurement headache. It is now one of the biggest barriers to technological innovation in flight systems and to aircraft production itself.
Avionics are particularly vulnerable, and the consequences ripple across both commercial airlines and military platforms. As 2026 unfolds, the industry is confronting a perfect storm of shortages, rising costs, geopolitical friction, and structural bottlenecks that threaten to delay next‑generation capabilities and strain national security priorities.
From Pandemic Lag to Chronic Backlogs
The aerospace industry never fully escaped the aftershocks of the COVID‑19 era. Aircraft deliveries that began to recover in late 2025 still lag demand by a wide margin. Production capacity for aircraft and engines is expected to remain outpaced by demand until at least 2031‑2034.
These bottlenecks are much more than a commercial inconvenience. They keep older, less efficient aircraft in service longer, increasing fuel and maintenance costs for airlines and slowing their adoption of more efficient avionics platforms.
Critical avionics systems, e.g. flight management computers, radar and communication suites, navigation instruments, and safety processors, depend on highly specialized semiconductors and materials. These components aren’t generic; they must meet stringent aviation standards, which means finding alternate suppliers or substitutes on short notice is almost impossible.
A persistent shortage of chips has been one of the greatest headwinds. These semiconductors are also essential for defense programs such as fifth‑generation fighters and advanced missile systems. When chips are scarce, every priority program competes for the same limited supply.
Supply issues aren’t limited to electronics. China’s restrictions on raw materials used in aerospace electronics have driven prices sharply higher, putting additional pressure on budgets and timelines.
Commercial and Military Aircraft: A Shared Vulnerability
One often overlooked reality is that commercial aviation and military aerospace share common production platforms for many avionics components. A digital flight deck in a Boeing 787 and the avionics suite in an F‑35 fighter might differ in capabilities and ruggedization, but at their cores they rely on many of the same suppliers and semiconductor wafers. When those supply chains strain, the pain is widely distributed.
The U.S. defense industrial base is deeply intertwined with global supply networks, depending on an ecosystem of over 200,000 suppliers, many of them abroad.
This global dependency, particularly on components produced in adversarial or unstable regions, presents national security risks. Fragmented supply chain data and limited transparency into the origin of parts make it difficult to manage risk proactively.
Military programs with complex avionics needs are often the first to be impacted by a tighter supply of semiconductors and specialized materials. Radar systems, secure communications modules, electronic warfare suites, and high‑speed processors require long lead times and are especially sensitive to supply gaps.
When commercial production priorities absorb the bulk of available chips or when geopolitical tensions disrupt availability, defense timelines extend and costs rise.
Costs That Extend Beyond Delivery Delays
The economic impacts are significant. Supply chain bottlenecks generate inflation in the commercial airline industry, due to increased fuel and maintenance costs, elevated engine leasing expenses, and the necessity to hold extra inventory to buffer against uncertainty.
The avionics procurement side of this equation further complicates matters. Airlines are delaying non‑critical avionics upgrades, choosing to stretch older systems’ lifespans rather than invest in new flight deck technologies until supply lines stabilize. This strategy squeezes avionics manufacturers’ cash flow and slows the diffusion of next‑generation capabilities.
Avionics manufacturers acknowledge that supply chain issues continue even as they ramp up production. Composite materials like aluminum and superalloys remain in short supply and labor shortages in component manufacturing persist. These are structural problems baked into a global ecosystem that thinned resources during the pandemic and is now struggling to rebuild them.
The result is an industry that must operate with caution and contingency. Waiting for a single avionics part can hold up entire aircraft deliveries, forcing airlines to keep older fleets flying longer and resetting operators’ expectations for modernization timelines.
Geopolitical Tensions and Trade Policy Risks
Global political tensions add another layer of complexity. Trade policy shifts have introduced tariffs on metals and electronics that are key to aircraft construction and avionics production. These tariffs raise the cost of inputs and complicate sourcing strategies, particularly when suppliers must reroute materials around tariff barriers or navigate protectionist policies.
Moreover, the geopolitics of semiconductor manufacturing (a sector that is concentrated heavily in East Asia) means that any escalation in regional tensions could have immediate, industry‑wide implications. Navies enforcing blockades, disruptions along the Red Sea route, or export controls on key materials quickly ripple through the aerospace supply chain, lengthening lead times and increasing costs.
Governments are recognizing the strategic importance of avionics supply chains. Incentivizing domestic semiconductor production and building stockpiles of critical materials are now policy discussions that carry weight in national capitals around the world.
This article originally appeared in our partner publication, Aircraft Value News.
John Persinos is the editor-in-chief of Aircraft Value News.