Rotor & Wing Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News Regional Aviation News Very Light Jets
Advanced Search
Geographic Search

Aviation Today Market Leaders
Photo Archives
Subscribe to R&W
R&W Media Kit
R&W BPA Statement
Press Release Archive
Digital Subscription

Top Stories
Information
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links

Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

GAO: USAF Erred on CSAR-X Maintenance Costs

As a part of its ruling sustaining Sikorsky and Lockheed Martin’s protests, the GAO said the Air Force’s method of calculating life-cycle costs among the three CSAR-X contenders wasn’t the one it outlined in its request for proposals. Specifically, the service used a standard cost, $591.4 million, to estimate the labor needed to support the new aircraft through their planned service lives. That didn’t sufficiently consider variations among the contenders, which differ significantly in size and design. Further, the labor estimate was based on the cost of supporting the USAF’s current HH-60Gs, whose maintenance hours per flight hour is double or more the requirement specified by the service for the new CSAR aircraft, the GAO said. For related news

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2008 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.





Asia/Japan China India/Pakistan Middle East Eastern Europe Western Europe Central America USA Canada Australia/New Zealand South America Africa Russia