Rotor & Wing Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News Regional Aviation News Very Light Jets
Advanced Search
Geographic Search

Aviation Today Market Leaders
Photo Archives
Subscribe to R&W
R&W Media Kit
R&W BPA Statement
Press Release Archive
Digital Subscription

Top Stories
Information
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Heard in the Hallways: Is the C.G. Shifting for Rotorcraft R&D in the U.S.?

That was a question on the minds of U.S. attendees at last month’s American Helicopter Society International annual gathering in Montreal.

What provoked the question? The U.S. Navy’s launch of a rotorcraft center of excellence, based at NAS Patuxent River, Md. It is headed by the Naval Air Systems’ Douglas Isleib (see the VH-71 item), who is one of just two full-time employees assigned to it. He billed the role of the center, called for by the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) panel recommendations for streamlining U.S. defense operations, as identifying common requirements for rotorcraft systems, soup to nuts, and coordinating efforts to satisfy them. He added that there is no reason that its efforts should not cover the needs and efforts of services other than the Navy and Marine Corps.

But others see the new center as a bid for control of military rotorcraft R&D funding. The former Marine deputy commandant for aviation, Gen. Michael Hough, for instance, said at AHS in Montreal that the center should take the lead in securing and steering science and technology funding for rotorcraft efforts. While the BRAC also called for establishing a rotorcraft center of excellence under the Army at Fort Rucker, Ala., Hough said "you don’t need two."

The move has some in Army aviation worried that the center of gravity for U.S. rotorcraft research could shift to the Navy. Several factors feed that concern.

Top advocates of Army aviation are retiring, among them Gen. Richard Cody (Army vice chief of staff), Brig. Gen. Stephen Mundt (director of aviation on the Army staff), Brig. Gen. Virgil Packett (commander of Fort Rucker and the Aviation Warfighting Center there) and Paul Bogosian (program executive for Army aviation). Add to that the fact that the Army has been starving rotorcraft research. Last year, for example, it went along with NASA’s move to cut from three to two the number of university R&D centers they fund.

That may not have been a wise move. The losing school was the University of Maryland. The leader of the majority Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives is Steny Hoyer. A key funder of research efforts in the Senate for years has been Barbara Mikulski. Both Hoyer and Mikulski are from Maryland, and both have voiced support for the Navy center.


Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2008 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.





Asia/Japan China India/Pakistan Middle East Eastern Europe Western Europe Central America USA Canada Australia/New Zealand South America Africa Russia