Rotor & Wing Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News Regional Aviation News Very Light Jets
Advanced Search
Geographic Search

Aviation Today Market Leaders
Photo Archives
Subscribe to R&W
R&W Media Kit
R&W BPA Statement
Press Release Archive
Digital Subscription

Top Stories
Information
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Eye on China: Trusted Partners?

EVERYBODY IN AEROSPACE, IT seems, is enticed by the huge potential market that is China. The complexities of dealing in that market are never far below the surface, however, as events reminded us last month.

In early October, the Kanwa Information Center, which describes itself as a "non-government-run news agency," put out a report that the "mysterious Z-10 combat helicopter that was indigenously developed over a 15-year period" is powered by the PT6C-67C imported from Pratt & Whitney Canada. The center’s director, Andrew Chang, noted that the U.S. has had an embargo against military exports to China since the 1989 attack on protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square and speculated that this case "may make Washington call for a tighter policy, especially regarding NATO countries."

Chang said he had obtained an official Z-10 brochure that listed the -67C as its powerplant.

The Z-10 is a touchy subject for Western helicopter makers, mainly because of government restrictions on military exports and the bad PR that can result from being viewed as a supplier to an authoritarian government with a dim view of human rights. At his press conference at the Paris Air Show in June, new Eurocopter President and CEO Lutz Bertling was asked about involvement in China. The questioning reporter made the mistake of implying that the Z-10 was among Eurocopter’s joint projects with the Asian giant. Bertling was emphatic in denying that.

AgustaWestland has been cited as a possible partner with China on the Z-10 (with some observers pointing to visible similarities between that aircraft and the A129 Mangusta), as has South Africa’s Denel. Denel officials report numerous visits by Chinese military and aerospace officials with many questions about the flight characteristics of Denel’s Rooivalk attack helicopters, including one case in which the visitors expressed interest in buying one. They apparently were denied.

Signs of China’s promise as a rotorcraft market build. The state-owned China Aviation Industry Corp. 2 (AVIC 2) is said to be investing 3 billion yuan ($400 million) in the development and production of civilian helicopters. (Most of that would go toward the 7-9-ton EC175 AVIC 2 is developing with Eurocopter.) The China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Corp. (CATIC) forecasts China will acquire 10,000 military and commercial rotorcraft, valued at $84 billion, through 2020.

An underlying concern for Western manufacturers, however, is that major involvement with Chinese companies on design and development will result in the "migration" of their designs and technology to China.

Eurocopter has largely set that concern aside by embracing China as a partner, leaving its companies to sell domestically while Eurocopter sells to most of the rest of the world. That has worked with the EC120, which was jointly developed by Eurocopter, CATIC’s Harbin Aircraft Manufacturing Corp., and Singapore Technologies Aerospace. Eurocopter in 2004 agreed to open a production line in China in conjunction with CATIC and Hafei Aviation Industry Co. to build the aircraft. Those built there are designated the HC120.

AgustaWestland also has a joint venture production facility in China, as does Sikorsky Aircraft.

Regarding the Z-10, Pratt Canada says it has done nothing wrong. The Canadian unit of U.S. industrial giant United Technologies said China selected it seven years ago to provide engines for a medium helicopter that would have military and civil variants with common dynamics. The PT6C-67C would power the civil aircraft, the company said, while a Chinese-developed engine would power the military ones. The Canadian government approved the sale of 10 engines on those terms, which Pratt Canada said were delivered in 2001 and 2002.

When development of the Chinese engine was delayed, Pratt Canada said, the PT6C was used to support development of the common aircraft. The company said China subsequently changed the program and the Canadian government is re-evaluating it.

Do you have a story to share about China’s helicopter market, or a burning question about it? Let us know at rotorandwing@accessintel.com.

Reader Comments

1.
I think if the air space is opened up in China like in the States and EU, it will definitely promote the civil markets, as many businessmen in China now can easily afford to buy and manintain civilian helicopters. SAR and air ambulance services are almost unheard of in China, although it does really exist. There is no justification for the military to control the sky and it should be managed by the CAAC like most of the countries. I do not see any benefits for the Chinese Government to control and suppress the development of aviation activities in China. The Chinese have many samples to learn from. A country can not be developed properly without the support of aviation infrastructure. A simple example can illustrate: it may take over 6-hr road journey to travel from A to B, whereas it may take just 90 min to accomplish the same journey by helicopter. It saves time and costs substantially. If the market is allowed to expand, the Chinese aviation industry will be justified to invest vast amounts of money to improve and invest in R&D with a view of supporting the demand within the country and possibly selling helicopters to overseas buyers. The Chinese Government needs to rethink seriously about the unnecessary control over the sky so that the aviation industry can be allowed to develop to its full force.
Posted by David Tang on Sunday, November 18, 2007 @ 11:30 AM
2.
The problem with the West is that greed and corruption is away there and they slag Russia down. Why is that? They can't get into its market the best helicopters in the world. One more thing, Germany was lifting on the hook of a helicopter 800KG to 2000 meters back in 1936. Let china build helicopters and good on them. Bring the price of helicopters down. Eurocopter, eat your heart out.
UK could have had the KA50, 100 times better than the Apache and 100 times cheaper. No corruption again from the West
Posted by Graham UK on Saturday, November 24, 2007 @ 11:59 AM

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2008 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.





Asia/Japan China India/Pakistan Middle East Eastern Europe Western Europe Central America USA Canada Australia/New Zealand South America Africa Russia