Aviation Today Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Jobs
Events
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us
Twitter

Monday, October 10, 2005

Flying versus driving and child safety

A number of organizations are not happy with the FAA withdrawing the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on child safety seats (see ASW, Sept. 12). Among those disappointed is the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), which on Sept. 27 filed a letter with the FAA expressing the AFA's "extreme disappointment" at the withdrawal action. The AFA took exception to one of the FAA's basic premises:

"The reasoning for the withdrawal ... is the same argument that the FAA has been using since 1990: that if the agency were to require the use of CRS [child restraint system] then some families would choose to drive to their destinations rather than fly. As we have stated in the past, the FAA's position is flawed because it is based on speculative assumptions. A National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report regarding diversions supports AFA's concerns ... that in some cases relevant to a specific vehicle, trip, and driver types that there may be an increased risk but the risk was not specific to children under 5 years of age. The [August 2004] summary continued:

" 'In total, there does not appear to be a clearly defined relationship between diversion from air travel and highway accidents or injury. In fact, despite acknowledged differences in relative risk between road and commercial airline travel in the United States, and the largest diversion from air travel in U.S. history in recent history during recent years, road fatalities and injuries to children under 5 years old have continued to decrease.'

"In order to promote aviation safety, AFA has for many years advocated the elimination of the rule allowing children under two years of age to be the only passengers allowed to be unrestrained during takeoff, landing, movement on the surface and during flight. The FAA too must recognize the safety concern of leaving these young travelers unrestrained, otherwise they would not be strongly recommending that parents use the appropriate restraint on their child [in the airplane] based on their size and age."


Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2010 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.
View Privacy Policy