Aviation Today Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Jobs
Events
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us
Twitter

Monday, July 6, 2009

Airbus: Maybe There’s a Better Way; Overnight News

The inability of searchers to locate the flight data and cockpit voice recorders aboard the ill-fated Air France Flight 447 has prompted Airbus, the manufacturer of A330-203 (F-GZCP), to consider redesign of the critical air safety devices so they broadcast the crucial data in advance of a crash.

Currently, the Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorders (CVR) simply serve as recording devices. The DFDR collects data from aircraft systems, while the CVR records crew conversation and aural warnings heard on the flight deck. Presently, the devices must be recovered in the wake of an accident after which information can be retrieved from the DFDR and CVR in a laboratory by skilled technicians. As designed, a DFDR and a CVR do not transmit real time information from an aircraft.

The DFDR and CVR work separately from a jetliner’s Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS), an air-to-ground link that automatically sends operational information, maintenance data and fault reports to the ground. But ACARS does not offer the bandwidth needed for real-time transmission of all the data stored in the DFDR and CVR.

As hope of finding the flight data and cockpit voice recorders on Flight 447 fades, Airbus has launched a study for improving flight data recovery, including, but not limited to, implementation of extended data transmission from commercial airliners, so that in the event of accidents, critical flight information can still be recovered and provided to accident investigation authorities even if finding the black boxes prove futile.

Tom Enders, president and CEO of Airbus says "gathering information from accidents is vitally important to further improve the safety of flying. Various technical means for reinforcing flight data recovery and data transmission to ground centers are principally available. We will now study different options for viable commercial solutions, including those where our experience with real-time data transmission from our own test aircraft could support the further development of such solutions."

The study will be conducted by Patrick Gavin, head of Airbus engineering, and Charles Champion, who is responsible for customer services. The study will address technological issues as well as data protection and privacy concerns. Airbus says it will collaborate with other aerospace companies, research institutions, and international airworthiness and investigation authorities in conducting the study. The aircraft maker did not cite a timeline for completion of the research effort.

With Flight 447’s black boxes nowhere to be found despite an extensive search by a flotilla of ships trawling the Atlantic waters, and with the homing signals fading fast, observers have questioned whether a revamped system for broadcasting the data would make successful recovery of the devices far less crucial.

But Forbes magazine quotes an expert as saying this is easier said than done. "The black box is invaluable, but transmitting it would be very difficult as there are 50 to 100 separate constant streams of data recording different things that come into the recorder simultaneously," said Keith Mackey, president of Mackey International, an aviation consultancy specializing in aviation safety and accident investigation. "It would send mountains of irrelevant data. We would have to have satellites to receive the data from all flying aircrafts. And the data would have to be transmitted to the ground with some way of recording it.”

Research on developing improved DFDRs and CVRs aside, finding the missing Air France black boxes would certainly help matters since most of what we learned on July 2 from the investigating team only served to deepen the mystery behind the loss of the Airbus A330 on June 1, which killed all 219 passengers and 16 crew members on board.

Air France Flight 447 had departed Rio de Janeiro bound for Paris. It flew into stormy weather and ACARS maintenance messages transmitted from the stricken jetliner near the equator to a maintenance base in Paris indicated that inconsistent speed measurements prompted by iced over pitot tubes could have played a role in the fatal crash, the worst in Air France’s history.

Still missing are the A320’s flight data and cockpit voice recorders, thought to be resting deep under water. Ships continue to troll the search area, pulling U.S. Navy underwater listening devices attached to 19,700 feet of cable.

Meanwhile, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is mulling over whether to require all airlines to replace Thales-made pitot tubes on their Airbus A330s. There are currently 600 Airbus A330 jets in revenue service, operated by 72 air carriers. After the loss of Flight 447, many carriers, including Air France, replaced the air speed sensors as a precaution.

Airbus had recommended replacing the devices after determining that they could be susceptible to icing. But neither EASA nor the FAA considered the risks posed by pitot tube icing to be significant enough to justify making replacement of the sensors mandatory.

The Flight 447 preliminary accident report by France's Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses, or BEA, runs over 125 pages, but it is remarkable how few facts have so far been established.

At the very least, the BEA crash investigators said they determined that the Air France jetliner that plunged from a stormy sky was intact when it smacked belly-first into the Atlantic Ocean at high speed. But they admitted that they still have no clear idea what caused the disaster.

Alain Bouillard, who is heading the accident probe, said "today we are indeed far from establishing the causes of the accident. The investigation is a big puzzle. Today we only have a few pieces of the puzzle which prevents us from even distinguishing the photo of the puzzle."

According to Bouillard, the following facts have been established:
• the crew possessed the licenses and ratings required to undertake the flight.
• the airplane possessed a valid Certificate of Airworthiness, and had been maintained in accordance with the regulations.
• the airplane had taken off from Rio de Janeiro without any known technical problems, except on one of the three radio handling panels.
• no problems were indicated by the crew to Air France or during contacts with the Brazilian controllers.
• no distress messages were received by the control centers or by other airplanes,
• there were no satellite telephone communications between the airplane and the ground.
• the last radio exchange between the crew and Brazilian ATC occurred at 1 h 35 min 15 s. The airplane arrived at the edge of radar range of the Brazilian control centers.
• at 2 h 01, the crew tried, without success for the third time, to connect to the Dakar ATC ADS-C system.
• up to the last automatic position point, received at 2 h 10 min 35 s, the flight had followed the route indicated in the flight plan.
• the meteorological situation was typical of that encountered in the month of June in the inter-tropical convergence zone.
• there were powerful cumulonimbus clusters on the route of AF447. Some of them could have been the centre of some notable turbulence.
• several airplanes that were flying before and after AF 447, at about the same altitude, altered their routes in order to avoid cloud masses.
• twenty-four automatic maintenance messages were received between 2 h 10 and 2 h 15 via the ACARS system. These messages show inconsistency between the measured speeds as well as the associated consequences.
• before 2 h 10, no maintenance messages had been received from AF 447, with the exception of two messages relating to the configuration of the toilets.
• the operator’s and the manufacturer’s procedures mention actions to be undertaken by the crew when they have doubts as to the speed indications.
• the last ACARS message was received towards 2 h 14 min 28 s.
• the flight was not transferred between the Brazilian and Senegalese control centers,
• between 8 h and 8 h 30, the first emergency alert messages were sent by the Madrid and Brest control centers.
• the first bodies and airplane parts were found on June 6.
• the elements identified came from all areas of the airplane.
• visual examination showed that the airplane was not destroyed in flight; it appears to have struck the surface of the sea in a straight line with high vertical acceleration.

Some of the messages suggest systems going off line, including the automatic throttle, the autopilot and the sensor that detects rapid changes of wind. There was a warning the cabin pressure was changing, and that the plane was operating with reduced fly-by-wire capabilities. The lack of a ‘mayday’ and the fact that no inflated life vests have been found, indicate that the jetliner dived into the ocean quickly and without warning. But the problem with this preliminary information is determining whether it represents the symptoms of technical failures, or the cause of them.

The apparent failure of the pitot tubes was "a factor," Bouillard said, but only one of several, including high winds, thunder, lightning and other possible equipment failures or human errors that remain unknown.

Although the homing signals on the black boxes should have weakened or shut off at the end of June, Bouillard said the acoustic search would go on until July 10. After that, through mid-August, searchers will employ diving equipment, towed sonars and unmanned underwater vehicles in hope of locating the devices.

As regards the lack of any airworthiness directive regarding the A330, Bouillard said he saw no reason at this point to ground the A330 or for passengers not to board them with confidence. "As far as I am concerned, there is no problem flying these aircraft," he told reporters near Paris. “There’s nothing to suggest they are unsafe. There are 660 of them flying that have flown millions of miles.”

Safety News
AF447-Preliminary report into Air France disaster contains hints of an epic struggle for control

Pre-Computer Cockpit Brings Different Outcome than AF447

Yemen airline cancels route after Comoros crash

Yemenia crash prompts ‘passengers power revolution’

Rescuers Find Debris Of Yemenia Aircraft

Flight recorders located from Yemen crash plane


Indonesia Expects EU To Lift Airline Ban

Does the E.U.'s Airline Blacklist Make Flying Safer?

Safety concern downs 4 airlines

NTSB Delivers Annual Report To Congress

Weekend/Overnight News
British Airways Cuts Capex While Shareholders Hope for Lower Oil

Is Tougher Airport Screening Going Too Far?


Worldwide airport traffic remains stubbornly low in May-2009

Delta plans more Cincinnati flight cuts

OpenSkies’ first birthday. Will it be orphaned by birthday #2?

How Institutions Manipulate the Price of Oil

Downward pressure on world jet fuel prices, global tourism outlook slashed

Cash squeeze may put United Airlines in a bind

ANA prioritises growth by raising $1.9 billion

BA cabin crew 'will reject pay proposal'

Vueling new airline name to UK

Jetstar claims NZ flights were sabotaged by Air New Zealand

XOJET streamlines fees with fixed-rate jet fares

Money train: The cost of high-speed rail

Air India employees strike to protest delayed paychecks

US LCCs slip, as does Ryanair, easyJet and Air Berlin, AirAsia up slightly

FedEx, UPS and US LCCs hit hard by weak US jobs report – Stock Wrap

Brazilian Gol Airlines SMILES

‘Clean Sky’ gets off the ground despite initial delay

SkyEurope’s black boxes indicate why airline failed

New airline to Liverpool starts flights on Monday

Frontier Airlines marks 15th anniversary

Pet Fees Raise Pax Ire

Now disembarking: Delta convenience

Dayton Airport strives to remain competitive


Budget Carriers Hit Bottom… And start digging

Ryanair to make passengers stand

Flybe now the UK’s number one domestic airline

Have questions about baggage fees? Airline a la Carte to the rescue!


Botswana: Regulatory Civil Aviation Charges to Go Up

Qantas loses Air NZ work to strikes

Tiger plans to expand domestic fleet

Flight attendants are pressing DOT to ensure American jobs are protected

Qantas traffic continues to plummet, but Jetstar international soaring

787 nosedive continues for Boeing – Share Wrap

Western Australians urged to avoid budget airlines when traveling to Bali

Zimbabwe: New Airline for Country

SpiceJet, Kingfisher Expect to Break Even This Financial Year

Why are cheap flights so cheap? The truth behind low cost airlines


EU official still optimistic about ETS from ICAO

Air fares plummet to record lows as competition increases


Ryanair misleading the public - Air Malta

United's O'Hare Computer Outage Addressed

Airlines Running on empty

Jacksonville pilot looking to start flights to Puerto Rico

Early Japanese civil aviation

Why has Travel Promotion Act stalled in the Senate?

Over one lakh more seats allocated to foreign airlines

Fly540 goes to Zimbabwe

China Southern first Chinese company to apply to invest in Taiwan

Southwest sees ready market at Mitchell

SpiceJet plans expansion ahead of going international

Long delay for Air India Express flight

Successful airline complaints

Is stuffed, narrow and miserable part of the plan for the Qantas Cityflyer fleet?

Audit: FAA should address air controller fatigue

Air New Zealand's ads, for those who enjoyed the safety video

Aeroplan girds for fight in court over expired miles

United Airlines relents on 'expired' ticket refund

South Africa: Confident New Airline Expands Services

Airport Check-in: Indianapolis auctions off airport items


Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2010 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.
View Privacy Policy