Regarding the Aug. 14 Helios B737 crash, Akrivos Tsolakis, the head of the Greek Investigating Commission of Air Accidents and Incidents, said recently, "We know where we are going [in the investigation] and I can say that we will know where we will end."
If so, the investigation may focus on the following:
- Warning horns.
- Positioning of pressurization and air conditioning gauges and switches in the overhead panels (out of the pilot's monitoring scan capabilities).
- Checklists (self challenge and reply having been largely discredited as just a reading - and thus prone to error, particularly in the after-takeoff check of the pressurization and air conditioning controls). The 10,000-foot check should also include a physical numerical readout of cabin altitude, differential and cabin rate-of-climb.
- Cockpit emergency access (also a Helios responsibility as it would appear that cabin crew didn't have the cockpit access codes).
- Oxygen line-valve positioning determination (is it ON/is it OFF? Hard to tell with a rotary valve).
- Larger issues.
- Do we need a dead man's handle for automated aircraft? (Some cockpits already have "pilot awake?" alarms that require a button to be pressed every so often - particularly for long-haul). A so-called dead man's handle would preclude a flight management computer (FMC) programmed climb to a protracted cruise at high altitude with an incapacitated crew.
- Do we need a regulation that says that crews must level off at a minimum safe altitude (or at least no higher than 14,000 feet) when a system irregularity is encountered in the climb?
- Do we need to pay more attention to the ability to initiate and comprehend conversational English used in troubleshooting (evidence here that confusion existed cross- cockpit and between cockpit and the ground technician)? Some cockpit crews are capable of only bare minimal technical English terminology in their communications and radio transmissions.
- Are regulations needed saying that all cockpit switches and circuit breakers must be left in standard positions following maintenance or tagged, flagged and annotated in aircraft documentation?
- Air traffic control (ATC) needs to ensure positive communications are established on hand-off at flight information region (FIR) boundaries. In other words, no more phantom jets.
- Cabin crew need basic indoctrination on how to dial up a frequency, squawk Mayday and communicate using a cockpit mike and headset. That covers pilot incapacitation (food- poisoning/terrorism/depressurization/smoke/poisoning/birdstrike/missile strike, etc.). It may be that the cabin crew need the capability to initiate a Mayday squawk (via a coded entry into a touchpad for instance), and/or a direct communications link capability via a cell-phone, perhaps.
- What is the constitution of simulator syllabus sorties covering pressurization failures and common crew and maintenance errors?