Aviation Today Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Jobs
Events
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us
Twitter

Friday, May 16, 2008

Northrop Grumman KC-45: Why We Won - Strengths and Weaknesses

WASHINGTON, May 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The U.S. Air Force found Northrop Grumman Corporation's (NYSE: NOC) bid to build the next generation of aerial refueling tankers superior to Boeing's in four of the five most important selection criteria. Despite this fact, the losing bidder wants the Government Accountability Office to overturn the Air Force decision to award the contract to Northrop Grumman even though the Air Force conducted what even Boeing described as a fair, open and transparent bidding process. Here is another reason Northrop Grumman won, drawn from a list of facts included in a redacted version of a protected Air Force selection document.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Boeing likes to claim that its proposed aircraft was rated better than Northrop Grumman's winning KC-45 tanker, stating that it was rated superior to Northrop Grumman on 98 items -- called "discriminators" -- while Northrop Grumman was superior on 30. But discriminators are not just "added up" -- they vary greatly in significance. Instead of focusing on the most important discriminators, Boeing is counting items that the Air Force judged were much less critical to the KC-X's core mobility mission.

In all, the Air Force identified approximately 800 requirements of varying importance. And the Air Force Request For Proposal (RFP) made clear that it considered Aerial Refueling and Airlift to be the two most important performance criteria. In these critical categories -- which go to the heart of the KC-X mission -- Northrop Grumman was clearly superior to Boeing, attaining a two-to-one advantage in key discriminators.

Where were Boeing's advantages? They were in less critical areas like having more interior electrical outlets, better flight deck seats, and the ability to carry secondary, rarely-used fuels -- like Swedish Kerosene.

How do more electrical outlets stack up against increased fuel offload over range? How do better flight deck seats compare to greater airlift capability? The conclusion is obvious. The Air Force made clear what its priorities were in the RFP, rated the two competitors, and selected the KC-45.

About the KC-45

The KC-45 Tanker aircraft will be assembled in Mobile, Ala., and the KC-45 team will employ 48,000 American workers at 230 U.S. companies in 49 states. It will be built by a world-class industrial team led by Northrop Grumman, and includes EADS North America, General Electric Aviation and Sargent Fletcher.

Northrop Grumman Corporation is a global defense and technology company whose 120,000 employees provide innovative systems, products, and solutions in information and services, electronics, aerospace and shipbuilding to government and commercial customers worldwide.


Copyright © 2010 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.
View Privacy Policy