Aviation Today Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us
Twitter

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Machinists Union Wary on Tanker Rebid Rules

WASHINGTON, July 10 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) is calling on Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates to ensure the new round of bidding for the Air Force refueling tanker contract does not include any residual bias from the initial competition, which contained significant errors and was heavily skewed toward the Airbus tanker.

“We are calling for aggressive oversight of the bidding process to make sure Boeing’s tanker is evaluated on a fair, level playing field,” said IAM General Vice President Rich Michalski. “We will not accept, nor should American taxpayers accept a process or an outcome that is only slightly less rigged than the initial round of bidding.”

Fresh concerns erupted following yesterday’s announcement that the Pentagon might once again use excessive fuel capacity and other criteria to favor the Airbus aircraft in a new round of bidding to replace the Air Force’s aging fleet of aerial refueling tankers.

The new competition will be limited to eight areas of concern highlighted in a scathing critique of the Air Force decision to award the $40 billion contract to EADS-Airbus, a European consortium fronted by Los Angeles, CA,-based Northrop Grumman Corp.

“I am concerned that the department is trying to find a new way to justify selecting the larger Airbus tanker again, even though there is no current operational requirement for a larger refueling tanker,” said Washington state Rep. Norm Dicks, who learned that the criteria for the new tanker will favor a larger tanker than was initially requested.

Rep. Dicks also noted that the Airbus is 53 percent larger than the Boeing 767, requiring greater maintenance and operations costs. He noted that the Boeing KC-767 could save $35 billion in fuel costs over 40 years — an amount large enough to equal the purchase of the entire fleet.

The IAM represents nearly 35,000 Boeing employees in Washington state, Oregon, Kansas and other locations across the country. For additional information about the IAM, visit www.goiam.org.


Copyright © 2009 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.
View Privacy Policy