Avionics Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
RTCA Fall Symposium

RTCA Spring Symposium


Avionics Videos
Customer Support Directory
AAI Membership
Avionics Tech Reports
Issue Archives
Acronym Guide
Industry Leader Profiles
Twitter
Facebook

Top Stories
AMC/AEEC

FSEMC

RTCA Fall Symposium
 
Subscribe
BPA Statement
Media Kit
Monthly E-letter
Subscribe
Jobs
Events
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Monday, February 1, 2010

Perspectives: Finding ‘No Fault’

As the United States fleet of military aircraft age, the maintenance of aircraft electronic Line Replaceable Units (LRU) and Weapons Replaceable Assemblies (WRA) poses an ever increasing challenge. Much of the challenge is related to intermittent faults that occur because of aging wiring and connections. These intermittent problems manifest themselves as “Bad Actor” LRUs/WRAs or as repair shop No Fault Found (NFF) and Cannot Duplicate (CND) test results.


Intermittent faults are a growing problem in electronic equipment. As integrated circuits (IC) and other electronic discrete parts become increasingly capable and reliable, an ever growing portion of the electronic equipment maintenance problems encountered are not component failure, but rather interconnectivity problems between the electronic piece parts.

The intermittent fault can be caused by a loose or corroded wire wrap, a cracked solder joint, a corroded connector contact, a loose crimp connection, a hairline crack in a printed circuit trace, or via a number of other phenomena, all very common in electronic equipment. Many times the intermittent open circuit will manifest itself during an initial troubleshooting test, such as in the electronic back shop of a military flying wing. But by the time the equipment item has been transported to a military depot for repair, the intermittent circuit is no longer open. This results in NFF. Some LRUs/WRAs now test NFF over 50 percent of the time when inducted into the repair shop.

Many of the “failed” LRUs/WRAs that end up testing NFF have no parts replaced and no other repair work performed at the depot. These boxes are turned right around and returned to the field as fully operable boxes, because the depot is unable to detect a problem. According to an inside Pentagon source, NFF and CND represent a multi-billion-dollar a year problem for our military.

Not only do these expended funds accomplish nothing useful, but the LRUs/WRAs experience the needless “wear and tear” of being shipped from the field to the depot and back again. A substantial share of these inconsistent test results and this NFF activity is attributed to intermittent circuits.

A common rule-of-thumb for older aircraft is that 40 percent to 60 percent of all pilot-reported aircraft system malfunctions that occur in the air go undetected during follow-on ground testing. These equipment items, with documented in-flight failures, operate properly, or register NFF, during post-flight testing, and thus the problems remain as undetected, unrepaired latent defects. The unit is placed back into service, hazarding the aircraft and crew, repeatedly wasting maintenance and operational resources and adversely affecting operational sortie capability. NFF resulting from age-induced intermittency is now one of the biggest aircraft maintenance cost drivers for the United States government.

The United States Air Force, working with Universal Synaptics, just completed the F-16 APG-68 Radar System Modular Low Power Radio Frequency (MLPRF) Small Business Innovative Research Grant (SBIR) joint testing project. The F-16 MLPRF chassis is the LRU with the highest NFF cost of all F-16 avionic boxes. More than $13 million in maintenance costs are incurred annually by the Air Force for just that portion of the F-16 electronic boxes that test NFF at the depot.

The $2.2 million SBIR investment has already returned over $20 million back to the Air Force. The service is taking the lead in reducing NFF by investing in a unique maintenance tool appropriately named the Intermittent Fault Detection and Isolation System (IFDIS). The system employs a thermal chamber with an integral shake table to lightly induce simultaneous thermal and vibration stress to the chassis while it is being interrogated by the Intermittent Fault Detector (IFD), which monitors all circuit paths concurrently and continuously, detecting any intermittent fault as short as 50 nanoseconds.

The temperature and vibration parameters are adjusted to levels appropriate for detecting intermittent faults in the particular item under test while strict adherence to the tolerances set by the original equipment manufacturer are followed.

With the military escalation in Afghanistan, and intelligent budget expenditures essential isn’t it about time we really examine the cost of NFF and make changes to solve it?

Ken Anderson is director of sales and marketing with Universal Synaptics Corp., of Ogden, Utah.

Reader Comments

1.
Ken is 100% correct in his assertions. NFF has a huge impact on end-to-end logistics costs, and the effects on the \'first-time-fix\' rate can have severe operational consequences. Aerospace is trapped in an age-old maintenance culture paradigm of \'box swapping\' LRUs. The real root cause of NFF is intermittency and degraded interconnections. Change the emphasis of avionics maintenance training and fault-finding from LRUs to root cause analysis, to the \"3 Cs\": cables, connectors and (LRU) chassis!
Posted by Giles Huby on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 @ 09:44 AM
2.
I completely agree! The average age of a U.S. Air Force jet is more than 24 years old climbing. We currently do not have the right equipment to test or salvage poor performing LRUs to keep them operational.

We need more solutions like this!
Posted by Concerned Airman on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 @ 12:22 PM
3.
As I\'ve learned in my experiences with these issues on a daily basis, I don\'t jump to any conclusions immediately. First impressions says that the $2.2 million investment vs. $20 million return sounds too good to be true, (sales pitch from Universal Synaptics) but I don\'t doubt that it is possible. It appears that the IFDIS model needs to be introduced to other systems as quickly as the contracts can be written to see if this cost/savings ratio can be seen elsewhere.
Posted by Sam Neill on Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 01:39 AM
4.
Hi Sam,

Thank you for taking the time to post a comment. I would be pleased to speak with you anytime to quantify for you the Reduction in Total Ownership Cost (RTOC) we are achieving on the MLPRF project and other LRU projects we are working on - please feel free to call me anytime at 801.731.8508 ex 1.

I am also very interested to see if we might be able to provide you with some solutions to the problems you are encountering on a daily basis.

I truly hope to have the opportunity to speak with you - please call anytime Sam.

Respectfully,

Ken Anderson
Posted by Ken Anderson on Friday, February 19, 2010 @ 11:17 AM
5.
These anomalies that you have discovered are nothing new, if fact, intermittent fault isolation, and the repair thereof, have confounded component repair organizations and technicians for years. The time and effort that here-to-fore have been necessarily expended to correct reported failures is considerable, and if fact, necessary. It is, and remains the most difficult repair task that any shop is faced with. As you are no doubt aware, the costs involved in endless troubleshooting, benefits no one. However, it is good to learn that in your new sales position, you have recognized the technicians frustrations in honestly attempting to correct intermittent faults.

I trust that you will continue to champion the MRO organizations that continue the task of isolating a problem, repair it, and return the LRU to the aircraft, in repaired condition.

Hopefully, you are not that far removed from your former endeavors in championing for your colleagues in the supply chain.
Posted by John Minietta on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 @ 11:52 AM
6.
This is entirely correct. Although much of the blame also rests on the lack of experience of the technicians performing the troubleshooting. All too often in my almost 20 years I have worked with technicians who don\'t fully \"enjoy\" working on electrical problems. It\'s easier to blame a box than take the time to read the wiring diagram and/or schematic and truly understand what is susposed to be happening and what actually is. The lack of competancy to utilize a logic diagram is also another failure. Maybe the military should invest a little more time in the finite training when it comes to aviation training. Afterall lets face it, if a U.S. Army/Air Force AVIATION soldier is spending time engaged in direct combat, then the war is lost and we shouldn\'t be there. Yes, we\'re all soldiers first. Been there, done that, got it. But when our tech school students are spending more time doing combat arms training than job skill training, we\'ve created our own recurring problem.
Posted by Steve on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 @ 12:31 PM
7.
We are wasting time and money everyday on NFF/CND issues...the Marine Corps needs to take a serious look at this and see if it has application to our boxes.

Could you apply this technology to BAMS UAS? 301-757-7417



Call 800
Posted by USMC on Thursday, March 25, 2010 @ 08:49 PM

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Stay connected to thought leaders in the aviation community.

Become a member of Avpronet.com,
the most active aviation community online.

 Follow us on Twitter

 Follow us on Facebook

Check out upcoming webinar: Airborne RFID: Radio Frequency Identification Takes Off
Register now.

Get Free News Updates & Analysis From Our Editors

First Name
Last Name
Title
Company
City
Country
State      Zip Code
Email
Job Function
Security Image
Please enter the security code
Home | Aviation Today's Daily Brief | Avionics | Aviation Maintenance | Rotor & Wing | Air Safety Week | Aircraft Value News | Jobs
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Advertise
Copyright © 2010 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.