Avionics Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News Regional Aviation News Very Light Jets
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Products and Services
Customer Support Directory
AAI Membership
Avionics Tech Reports
Issue Archives
Acronym Guide
Industry Leader Profiles
NBAA Product Showcase
Avionics Blog

Top Stories
AMC
FSEMC
AEEC
Information
Subscribe
BPA Statement
Media Kit
Monthly E-letter
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Friday, November 1, 2002

Feedback

The Continuous Altitude Rule

The July 1 midair collision over Germany, which you commented on in the September issue (Editor’s Note, page 6), could have been avoided with a "continuous altitude rule," as proposed in my paper, titled "A Linear Altitude Rule for Safer and More Efficient Enroute Air Traffic."

Current aviation rules concentrate all cruising traffic in discrete altitudes at steps of 1,000 or 2,000 feet. A continuous altitude rule, on the other hand, designates cruising altitudes as a continuous function of course (or heading). Under this rule, designated cruising altitudes vary continuously by 1,000 feet for each 180 degrees of change in course (assuming reduced vertical separation minima, or RVSM, is in effect). This spreads the traffic vertically and greatly reduces the probability of a midair collision between cruising aircraft.

The two aircraft that collided, a DHL Boeing 757 and a Bashkirian Airlines Tu-154, were both cruising at 36,000 feet, with a crossing angle of approximately 90 degrees between them. Had the continuous altitude rule been in effect, the two aircraft would have had a default vertical separation of 500 feet in cruise.

Even if no action had been taken, a collision would have been extremely unlikely. Furthermore, conflicting resolution advisories of the sort that caused the collision would have also been extremely unlikely.

Name Change

Reading the article, "Product Focus: VHF Radios," we noticed that you still use our former company name in the company listing. We would like to inform you that our company has undergone a name change: Alcatel Air Navigation Systems GmbH has become Thales ATM GmbH. The Web site "alcatel.com" no longer exists; our Web site is now www.thales-atm.com


Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2008 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.





?>