Avionics Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News Regional Aviation News Very Light Jets
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Products and Services
Customer Support Directory
AAI Membership
Avionics Tech Reports
Issue Archives
Acronym Guide
Industry Leader Profiles
NBAA Product Showcase
Avionics Blog

Top Stories
AMC
FSEMC
AEEC
Information
Subscribe
BPA Statement
Media Kit
Monthly E-letter
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links

Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Perspectives: Production Variance

As I have read and listened to the discussion of airline profitability and air-traffic control (ATC) problems, punctuated by bankruptcies, delays, congestion, meltdowns, etc., I have concluded the problem, and therefore the solution, lies outside the current industry focus. Please allow me to explain.

For more than 30 years, in spite of their best efforts, the network airlines and the world’s ATC systems have continued to produce less-than-stellar results, both financially and operationally. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the fundamental problem pushing so many airlines toward the brink is not the hub schedule, weather, fuel costs, ATC, congestion, delays, lack of technology or even unit wage rates.

The underlying cause of 80 percent of the airline industry’s financial problems and the inability of the ATC system to meet demand is production variance created by the unmanaged complexity within the airline.

Production variance, driven by unmanaged complexity within the airline’s daily operation, especially at the hub airports, represents the fundamental flaw within the current airline/ATC production process that, over time, will decimate airline after airline. Yet production variance, the inability to consistently deliver a quality product, is not measured, quantified, or is it clearly understood.

To solve this problem, one must first forget it is an "airline" or "ATC" problem. Conversely, think production, think right part, right place, right time (smiling pax, bag/cargo, destination curb, on time), think lean. Think of this as a flow of materials problem. Think 1950s production process (current airline/ATC linear production process) versus Toyota production system (required airline/ATC production process).

For example, by adopting industrial engineering principles outside the mainstream thought process, Toyota embraced lean production. Based on W. Edwards Deming’s principal of "build the process that gives the right answer, first time, every time," Toyota leapfrogged Detroit’s outdated production processes from the 1970s right up to the early 1990s, when the Big Three belatedly woke up and smelled the coffee.

First, let me say that airlines’ financial problems cannot be laid at the feet of the government or deregulation, and cannot be solved by the government. Yes, of course, the build-up of aviation taxes, security measures and FAA’s less-than-sterling performance over the last 30 years add to the problem, but they are not the problem.

It is clear airlines need a new direction, or actually an old direction. I continue to go back to Deming, whose theory is that the only way to reduce costs is to improve quality. And one of the fastest ways to improve quality is to significantly reduce the large amount of production variance (i.e., defects) airlines and aviation authorities now incorrectly accepted as "normal" within their operations. (More than 40 percent of your product delivered late is definitely not normal).

As Jack Welch of GE is reported to have said, "Variation is evil." We agree.

Within two to three years, airlines will have the ability to improve on-time arrival, while decreasing block time 10 minutes per flight, with no change in the weather or ATC system. While it is not hard to accomplish this, actually believing it can be done and accepting the fact that the airlines already have all of the communication tools, data, internal control and capability to accomplish this task on their own is very hard.

As a path forward to solve the airline/ATC production problem, ATH Group has been working to bring the Lean Six Sigma philosophy to the airline industry through our patented "Attila" solution for over 15 years.

Based on our analysis, the airlines must, first and foremost, stabilize the movement of their aircraft. Further, airlines must understand and verbalize that FAA is not relevant in the current discussion of delays and congestion. First and foremost, FAA’s solution is 10 years away at best. What are airlines going to do for their customers tomorrow and the next day?

In summary, it is not the network peaked schedule, airport capacity, lack of runways, the ATC system, nor too little technology that drives up costs, decreases utilization and limits revenue through poor quality, but the network operation as currently operated, which represents a relatively simple, and solvable logistics problem.


Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2008 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.