Air Safety Week Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Jobs
Events
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Monday, March 19, 2007

This Week's Silliest Idea? or Not?

In the desperate search for a cheaper solution to the MANPAD's shoulder-fired missile threat at airports worldwide, DHS Under Secretary for Science and Technology Jay Cohen has previewed a concept involving a robot "eye in the sky". The Dept. of Homeland Security suggestion is that instead of each and every airliner carrying an anti-MANPADs Detection and Destruction Kit, one singular UAV (Unmanned Air Vehicle) should orbit major airports and do the job for all. It's been dubbed "Project Chloe" (after the well-known character with all the tech solutions in TV's action suspense sitcom "24"). It's a solution to another different type of threat profile. Airlines have rebelled en masse at the prospect of helping fund an $11bn project to equip every airliner with a missile deterrent. That figure is based upon a 2005 Rand study. On top of that is the added weight/drag and fuel penalties of having to carry such devices.

Having a UAV fly at 65,000ft over a major airport on persistent surveillance could be part-funded "by leasing onboard space to cellular telephone companies," says Jay Cohen. The US government has spent $121M researching counter-measures since 2003. DHS has spent $7.4M on funding a Raytheon, L-3 Comms and Northrop Grumman search for a non-laser jamming solution. Raytheon has the Vigilant Eagle (high energy counter-pulse), Skyguard (Northrop Grumman) uses a chemical-fuel laser, but both of these systems are ground-based. Avisys Corp (L-3) uses a warning system to trigger low-tech infra-red decoys.

The idea behind the high-level UAV is to seduce any missiles to a height beyond their maximum ceiling, exhausting their fuel and causing them to drop from the sky. "Will it work? I don't know, but we're going to do it," Cohen told a 13 March homeland security technology summit.

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2010 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.
View Privacy Policy