Air Safety Week Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News Regional Aviation News Very Light Jets
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Unapproved Parts Notification

Almost a month after a U.S. District Court sentenced George Myles to a 76-month prison term for falsifying parts paperwork, the FAA has released an Unapproved Parts Notification. The indictment read that George Myles, Jr., the sole owner of Miles Aviation, Inc., was awarded numerous Department of Defense contracts to provide various aircraft parts to the USAF. These contracts called for parts to be provided in either "new" or "new surplus" condition. Nevertheless Myles would purchase the requested parts on the open market, usually in an "as removed" used condition. Thereafter, Myles would send the used parts to the U.S. military, certifying on an ATA 106 Part or Material Certification Form that the requested parts were "new" or "new surplus," when in fact they were used. Additionally, Myles supplied numerous aircraft parts to civilian purchasers, and similarly shipped these parts with either a materially false ATA 106, or included an FAA Form 8130, certifying that the requested parts were airworthy. However, George Myles, Jr. and Miles Aviation, Inc., were not licensed by the FAA to perform any inspections, repairs, or overhauls, and thus could not certify the airworthiness of aircraft parts. Unfortunately for operators, tracking which parts originally came from Myles might be difficult because the company sold to third-party suppliers, according to the DOT’s Inspector General’s Office, which helped prosecute the case.

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2009 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.