Just how close to the bone does ARAC come in its planning criteria for extended operations (ETOPS)?
Airbus says too close (see ASW, March 24). During the ARAC discussions, it was suggested that the possibility of an engine loss and a pressurization loss was so remote that planning for it was unnecessary. As...
For immediate service; more information; and multi-user access (site license), non-profit organization, educational institute pricing, contact Sarah Garwood sgarwood@accessintel.com at (301) 354-1705.
This story is only available to paid subscribers. Please login below with your username and password if you are a subscriber.
Subscribe Trial