Aviation Maintenance Free e-Mail Newsletter Free Aviation Job Alerts
Home Aviation Today's Daily Brief Avionics Aviation Maintenance Rotor & Wing Air Safety Week Aircraft Value News
View by Category:  Military | Commercial | Business & General Aviation | Rotorcraft | Air Traffic Control | Maintenance
Advanced Search


Aviation Today Market Leaders
Subscribe
Repair Center Directory
Industry Leader Profiles
Monthly E-letter
Follow Us On Twitter
Information
Aviation Industry Expo 2008
Twitter

Top Stories
BPA Statements
Commercial Media Kit
General Aviation Media Kit
Subscribe
Jobs
Podcasts
Webinars
Videos
Blogs
Databases &
   Buyer's Guides

White Papers/
   Technical Reports/
   Supplements

Research Reports
Article Archives
Press Releases
From the PR Wires
Industry Links



Top Stories
Aviation e-letter
Financial Center
Calendar
Media Kits
About Us
Contact Us

Friday, March 14, 2008

GE identifies Defective Fan Blades

General Electric will sell, at a heavy discount, CF34-3B1 engine fan blades to Bombardier CRJ operators affected by a service bulletin calling for replacements to be installed during a two-year period. The engine manufacturer identified about 13,000 fan blades from CF34-3B1 engines that power CRJ200 aircraft as being defective. Rough estimates show the blades are present on about 1,500 CF34-3B1 engines. The NTSB issued recommendations to the FAA, citing a safety concern raised by two engine failures on CF34-powered CRJ200s. In both instances a fan blade on a CF34-3B1 turbofan engine fractured, causing a loud bang, severe vibration and, in one case, an engine fire. Examination of the blades showed they failed because of a material defect introduced during the manufacturing process. GE said Teleflex Aerospace machined the titanium alloy blades in Mexico between late 2002 and late 2006 from billets containing a higher percentage of aluminum than was appropriate. "With a higher concentration of aluminum, there is a higher content of hard particles and this makes it more susceptible to cracks," GE said. A number of changes have occurred since the fan blade problem was identified including Teleflex building the fan blades to specification. Teleflex sold its Teleflex Aerospace Manufacturing Group unit to UK aerospace firm GKN in 2007. The NTSB issued six recommendations to the FAA, including that it require GE Aviation to define a reasonable maximum time frame below 4,717 cycles since new for these Teleflex fan blades and require that the blades be removed from service before that limit is exceeded. The NTSB also wants the agency to require GE to include additional testing in the manufacturing process for those blades, and to make modifications in its CF34-1/-3 engine design to ensure that high engine vibrations - such as can happen when a fan blade fractures - will not cause the engine to catch fire.

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
Comments:

Please enter the letters or numbers you see in the image.

 
Your message will be reviewed before it is posted.

Copyright © 2009 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without express written permission of Access Intelligence, LLC is prohibited.
View Privacy Policy





121five.com